Date: October 2023.
Source: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 152(4):p 675e-688e | DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010441.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare three surgical interventions for correction of sagittal synostosis—frontobiparietal remodeling (FBR), extended strip craniotomy (ESC), and spring-assisted correction (SAC)—based on three-dimensional (3D) photogrammetry and operation characteristics.
Materials and Methods: Patients who were born between 1991 and 2019 and diagnosed with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis who underwent FBR, ESC, or SAC and had at least one postoperative 3D photogrammetry image taken during one of six follow-up appointments until age 6 were considered for this study. Operative characteristics, postoperative complications, reinterventions, and presence of intracranial hypertension were collected. To assess cranial growth, orthogonal cranial slices and 3D photocephalometric measurements were extracted automatically and evaluated from 3D photogrammetry images.
Results: A total of 322 postoperative 3D images from 218 patients were included. After correcting for age and sex, no significant differences were observed in 3D photocephalometric measurements. Mean cranial shapes suggested that postoperative growth and shape gradually normalized with higher occipitofrontal head circumference and intracranial volume values compared with normal values, regardless of type of surgery. Flattening of the vertex seems to persist after surgical correction. The authors’ cranial 3D mesh processing tool has been made publicly available as a part of this study.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that until age 6, there are no significant differences among the FBR, ESC, and SAC in their ability to correct sagittal synostosis with regard to 3D photocephalometric measurements. Therefore, efforts should be made to ensure early diagnosis so that minimally invasive surgery is a viable treatment option. Therapeutic, III.

Article: Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Comparing Surgical Techniques Using 3D Photogrammetry.
Authors: Tareq Abdel-Alim, Melissa Kurniawan, Irene Mathijssen, MD, PhD, Marjolein Dremmen, MD, Clemens Dirven, MD, PhD; Wiro Niessen, PhD, Gennady Roshchupkin, PhD, Marie-Lise van Veelen, MD, PhD.

Related Articles:

  1. Projection-wise Disentangling for Fair and Interpretable Representation Learning: Application to 3D Facial Shape Analysis. X Liu, B Li, E Bron, W Niessen, E Wolvius, G Roshchupkin.
  2. Geometric learning and statistical modeling for surgical outcomes evaluation in craniosynostosis using 3D photogrammetry. C Elkhill, J Liu, MG Linguraru, S LeBeau, D Khechoyan, B French, AR Porras.
  3. Appearance or attitude: what matters to craniosynostosis patients? Association of self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and facial aesthetics in patients with sagittal and metopic synostosis. A Svalina, E Heikura, T Savolainen et al.
  4. A New Measure of Posterior Morphology in Sagittal Craniosynostosis: The Occipital Bullet Index. GP Bins, D Cull, RG Layton, S Kogan, L Zhou, BT Dunson, LR David, CM Runyan.